jefflembeck’s avatarjefflembeck’s Twitter Archive—№ 9,511

        1. …in reply to @undefined
          standayweb filamentgroup so, that solution may decrease wire weight, in that the response from the server might be a bit smaller, but (1)
      1. …in reply to @jefflembeck
        standayweb filamentgroup given the additional complexity added by having a JS-driven website, and having to load the JS necessary for (2)
    1. …in reply to @jefflembeck
      standayweb filamentgroup we're probably dealing with leaving out some devices that might handle the changes poorly + common probs like (3)
  1. …in reply to @jefflembeck
    standayweb filamentgroup breaking the back button, properly handling routes, etc. Libs that are good at this are really heavy, and (4)
    1. …in reply to @jefflembeck
      standayweb filamentgroup don't really benefit us for the type of site that we're creating.